top of page
Search

July 7, Day 188 – Even Good Leaders Do Foolish Things

"Hiding Mouse" © by Terri L. Stricker - Original Ink & Colored Pencil on Paper
"Hiding Mouse" © by Terri L. Stricker - Original Ink & Colored Pencil on Paper

In 2 Kings 12:1-14:22, we observe that the reigns of Joash, Amaziah, and later, Azariah and Jotham – all good kings – provided a breath of fresh air for the Jews in Judah at a time of awful evil all around them in Israel.  Today we come to the reign of Joash, the boy king, and we see the continued succession of the kingdoms in Judah and Israel.  Both kingdoms are operating under the stresses and threats of Aramean domination by Hazael, the king of Aram.  We see that Joash “did what was right in the eyes of the LORD all the years Jehoiada the priest instructed him” (verse 2).  Joash became concerned about the state of the temple, and he instructed the priests to “collect monies to be used to repair whatever damage is found in the temple” (verses 4-5).  However, after “twenty-three years, the priests still had not repaired the temple” (verse 6).  As a result, Joash told Jehoiada to install a new system for collections, and – as sufficient funds came in – to pay the workmen for repairs.  Interestingly, no accounting for the money was required because “the workers acted with complete honesty” (verse 15).  At this time, Hazael “turned to attack Jerusalem, but Joash sent the temple gold to him and he withdrew from Jerusalem” (verses 17-18).  In chapter 13, we see the reign of Jehoahaz – king of Israel.  Jehoahaz, like all the other kings of Israel, was wicked, for which reason, “the LORD kept him under the power of Hazael” (verse 3).  Hazael basically decimated his army (verse 7).  Jehoahaz was followed by his son, Jehoash, who also “did evil in the eyes of the LORD” (verse 11).  Little of substance is recorded about him.  Next, before Elisha’s death, we see the prophet’s command that Jehoash “strike the ground with arrows” (verse 18).  He struck the ground – but only three times – foreshadowing his defeat of the Arameans only three times (verse 25).  Elisha’s miracles continued even after his death, as we see that a dead man was thrown into his tomb, but upon touching Elisha’s bones, the man was raised up alive (verses 20-21).  In chapter 14:1-22, we see the reign of Amaziah.  Although he did what was right in the eyes of the LORD, his challenge to Jehoash was foolish – ending in his capture, his property destroyed, his resources lost, and a conspiracy against him which led to his death.  This situation reveals that even good leaders do foolish things.


Psalm 81:1-7 calls us to “sing for joy to God our strength.” Singing elevates our hearts and souls, and it is a form of praise that we should frequently direct toward our Creator, Who is the Source and Strength of our very being.  He enables us to sing.  We have been created to praise and worship God – that’s our purpose for existing – so singing to God should occupy our hearts, minds, and voices often.


Acts 25:1-22 continues with Paul’s defense against his Jewish accusers before Festus, who responds much in the same way as Felix did.  True to form, Paul’s accusers “brought many serious charges against him, but they could not prove” his guilt (verse 7).  As a Roman citizen facing unjust accusations, Paul had every right to appeal to Caesar.  Here, we see the implementation of God’s eternal plan – sovereignly established from before the foundation of the world – to utilize Paul as a Roman citizen in a mighty way at Rome.  We recall earlier that Felix wanted to grant a favor to the Jews (cf., Acts 24:27), and here in verses 13-22, we see that Festus also “wished to do the Jews a favor” (verse 9).  Why all these favors?  Such favors usually smack of political corruption, and we wonder, if that is the case here?  Will Paul actually get justice?  Festus openly admitted that “he was at a loss to investigate these matters” (verse 20).  However, we know that neither Festus nor Agrippa – like so many politicians – will act justly on Paul’s behalf because they are merely political pawns concerned with nothing more than serving their own self-interests.  Festus should have “investigated these matters” more carefully.   This situation reveals that bad leaders also do foolish things.

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page